Jason Kaspar – Page 5 – What Does This Mean?

Who’s Not Going to Heaven?

I’ve recently written two articles. First, the LCMS and those in our global fellowship are the only right teaching church. And, some non-Lutherans will surely go to heaven, but we’ll all be Lutheran in heaven. Now, there are folks calling themselves Christians who will not go to heaven.

False Teachers and those who firmly believe their demonstrably false teaching are prob’ly not going to heaven.

Concerning diseased trees who will be known by their bad fruits, Jesus says, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’” (Matthew 7:21-23)

Jesus says about false teachers, “Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me, but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” (Matthew 18:5-6) We are all to trust what we hear like little children, trust the words of our father and mother. But woe to those leading any astray. The depths of the sea are for Satan and His minions, miscreants, and myrmidons. “Then a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea.” (Revelation 18:21a) The Dragon, the great serpent, who is the Devil belongs there in the sea.

Francis Pieper warns strongly about continually, knowingly, teaching falsely because others have done the same. “Over against such notions we need to perceive clearly and to maintain firmly that the “felicitous inconsistency,” through which by the grace of God an erring Christian is kept from losing his personal faith, in no way extenuates the error, much less legitimizes it. Those who defend their false teaching by citing the case of pious erring fathers are reminded by Luther of a possible eventuality: they follow the pious fathers indeed, but will not be with them at the end. Teaching in the House of God, the church, is a most serious matter. The teachers of the church must never forget: 1. Scripture nowhere gives any man the license to deviate in any point from God’s Word.”

Point one is very clear. When God’s Word refutes the existence of female “pastors,” the denial of infant faith, the denial of the real physical presence of Christ for the forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation in the Lord’s Supper, the denial of two genders given to us by God from creation, the denial of Jesus’ full forgiveness by the words of your pastor, and the like, there is no room in Christianity for a false teacher unless they repent and turn from their sin. Yet false teachers persist in their refuted error.

“… 2. Every departure from the Word of Christ, as found in the Word of His Apostles, is expressly designated an offense. Romans 16:17: ‘Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them.’” When we hear false teachers, we must call out the error. Furthermore, we must also withdraw ourselves and our families from the false teaching.

“… 3. Everyone who rejects the testimony of scripture concerning one doctrine, actually, though he is not fully aware of it, invalidates the Christian principle of [inerrancy].” It is impossible to deny a “small area” of doctrine. All of the scriptures are breathed out by God. There is no shady spot for a teacher, a student of God’s Word, to hide themselves in a known rejection of God’s Word.

“… 4. Finally, we should always bear in mind that, like sin in the sphere of morality, so every error in the sphere of doctrine has the tendency to spread and to infect other doctrines with its virus.” The false teaching of false teachers is an infection in Christianity. It spreads like a virus, damaging all the tissues in the Body of Christ that it touches. The only solutions for Christianity are avoidance, treatment, or surgery. (All four quotes: Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, Volume I, p. 89-91, © 1950, CPH, St. Louis, MO)

Avoidance keeps us and our families away from the infection of false teaching. Treatment seeks to cure the infection with repentance and renewal in the faith, away from false teaching. Surgery severs us from the false teaching/teachers by removing them from us and our families.

Stay tuned, there is still more: does a “Christian Church” exist?

Close your ears to false teachers, dear Christians.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

Only Lutherans Are Going to Heaven?

Do you think only Lutherans are going to heaven?

On the heels of my writing that the LCMS and those in our global fellowship are the only right teaching church, folks will hastily and uncharitably say things like, “I bet you think only Lutherans are going to heaven!” or “Pastor’s gonna be surprised that there aren’t only Lutherans in Heaven.”

Of course, that’s neither what I believe nor what I teach. We think of ourselves as smart and witty when popping off like that. “There you sit, like butter in sunshine,” encumbered in wit neither by speed nor sharpness. (Luther’s Works AE, Volume. 40, p. 252, © CPH, St. Louis, MO) It’s really just the rude and disrespectful talk over to which our sinful tongues are given. The eighth and fourth commandments warn us against such idle claptrap.

There will most certainly be Non-LCMS Lutherans in heaven. We trust here not in the false teachings of other Christian churches. Instead, we trust in the felicitous inconsistency. Luther coined the term, but we understand its use better from Francis Pieper’s Christian Dogmatics (Vol. I: p. 6, 72, 84, 87-91; Vol. II: p. 156 © 1950, CPH)

The felicitous inconsistency is a happy accident, a result differing from what false teaching is likely to deliver: unbelief and hell. The felicitous inconsistency is the teaching in Christianity that where the Word of God is heard, true faith may spring-up in contradiction of false teaching. This is no guarantee. It’s our hope and prayer that the Lord grants faith to those who hear and preserves them in that faith. This hope and prayer flies against the false teaching in heterodox churches. It isn’t a thing we ought to expect or into which we ought to place our trust.

Loving our family, friends, and neighbors requires us to encourage them away from false teachers and heterodox churches. Simply being in a “Christian” church is good, but it’s certainly not good enough. In love, we ought to want our loved ones to hear only right teaching. We should want the Word of God AND right teaching entering their ears and hearts together rather than simply hoping God will preserve them.

Even in orthodox churches like our LCMS churches, Jesus warning about wheat and tares still holds true (Matthew 13:24-30). There will still be unbelievers gathered with the faithful until the last day. Only then the Lord will finally sort us into the fire and into salvation. Fear not! If this worries you, that’s great news. The unbelieving tares don’t care about their salvation one bit. That’s not you.

All that being said, there will certainly be non-LCMS Lutherans in heaven. But, in heaven we will all finally be Lutheran. In heaven we will all finally trust in grace alone apart from works. We will never doubt the salvation won on the cross, delivered in Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, and sealed with us in the bodily resurrection. And, there will not be one unbeliever among us.

Hang tight, there’s more to be said about this felicitous inconsistency concerning the false teachers too. In Christ all will finally be one, just not quite yet.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

Is Lutheran The Only Right Church?

I frequently get some version of this question, “Do you really think the Lutheran Church* is the only right church?” (*the LCMS and those Lutherans in our global fellowship)

Yes, I do. And, you ought to thank the Lord if your pastor isn’t some unfaithful, vow-breaking squish, who believes one thing and says another. Summer is the season of installations and ordinations in the LCMS. Nearly every weekend from mid-June through August, there will be such an event at an LCMS congregation. The Vows taken by your pastor and the others like him are these:

“Do you believe and confess the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments to be the inspired Word of God and the only infallible rule of faith and practice? Yes, I believe and confess the canonical Scriptures to be the inspired Word of God and the only infallible rule of faith and practice.” (LSB Agenda, p. 165)

What does this mean? This means that the Christian faith must never embrace what scripture condemns and never condemn what scripture extolls. There are a good number of Christian churches and pastors falling outside of this first vow. Anyone denying infant Baptism or infant faith, denies scripture’s plain teaching. Anyone denying Baptismal regeneration, denies the scriptures. Anyone denying the forgiveness of sins and the true, bodily presence of Jesus in Holy Communion, denies the Word of God. Anyone engaged in the ordination of women into the Holy Ministry, despises the Word of God. Anyone teaching the re-sacrifice of Jesus in the mass, rejects the scriptures. This list is far from exhaustive.

“Do you believe and confess the three Ecumenical Creeds, namely, the Apostles’, the Nicene, and the Athanasian Creeds, as faithful testimonies to the truth of the Holy Scriptures, and do you reject all the errors which they condemn? Yes, I believe and confess the three Ecumenical Creeds because they are in accord with the Word of God. I also reject all the errors they condemn.” (ibid.)

What does this mean? All heresies rejected in the creeds, we reject. In current terms, that means things like the constant, popular, gnostic view of death. Death is not a release of the soul from the body. Death is the unnatural, violent separation of soul from body. Death is not the final destination. The resurrection of all flesh and the restoration of soul and body together on the last day is the completion of all things promised to Baptized Christians. Also, the creeds may not be rejected by Christians, as some do (Joel Osteen, many Baptists, et al).

“Do you confess the unaltered Augsburg Confession to be a true exposition of Holy Scripture and a correct exhibition of the doctrine of the Evangelical Lutheran Church? And do you confess that the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, the Small and Large Catechisms of Martin Luther, the Smalcald Articles, the Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope, and the Formula of Concord—as these are contained in the Book of Concord—are also in agreement with this one scriptural faith? Yes, I make these confessions my own because they are in accord with the Word of God.” (LSB Agenda, p. 166)

What does this mean? This is where the rubber meets the road. The Lutheran Confessions are correct in their entirely. Lutheran Pastors vow this BECAUSE they are the right exposition of and in accord with the Word of God. As stated above, we can identify errors in other Christian confessions. In my short 47 years upon the Earth, I have neither discovered an error in our confessions, nor been shown one. If I or any other Lutheran pastor were convinced of such an error, we would be bound by the first vow to the scriptures alone to fight ceaselessly and publicly against the error, or leave the Lutheran Confession.

“Do you promise that you will perform the duties of your office in accordance with these Confessions, and that all your preaching and teaching and your administrations of the sacraments will be in conformity with Holy Scripture and with these Confessions? Yes, I promise, with the help of God.” (ibid.)

What does this mean? All Lutheran pastors are bound by these vows to conform themselves to the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions of the Unaltered Book of Concord (1580 AD). We must condemn what they condemn and extoll what they extoll. There is no wiggle room or lateral movement. Lutheran pastors are or are not faithful.

Christians teaching a different confession are in error.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

Behold, My Sheep, I Will Search You Out

A New Hymn!

This hymn text is based upon Ezekiel 34:11-16; Ezekiel 36:22-23, 26-28; Ezekiel 37:1-2, 7-8, 10-13; and Job 19:26-27. It’s certainly also suitable for Psalm 23 or another shepherd text. Check back for a video link in a few weeks.

I presented this hymn at the 2nd Annual Church Music Beautification Conference at Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool on April 22nd of 2023.

Ezekiel 34:11-16 is the assigned text for The 3^rd Sunday of Easter in the one-year lectionary, The Last Sunday of the Church Year in the three-year series A, and proper 19 in the three year series C. Ezekiel 36:22-28 is the assigned text for the seventh Sunday of Easter in the one-year lectionary. Ezekiel 37:1-14 is the assigned text for the second Sunday of Easter in the one-year lectionary, the fifth Sunday of Lent in the three-year series A, and Pentecost Day in the three-year series B. Job 19:23-27 is the assigned text for Easter Day in the one-year lectionary, Easter Sunrise in the three year series C, and the service of graveside committal. Psalm 23 is the assigned psalm for the third Sunday of Easter in the one-year lectionary, Easter Day in all three years of the three-year series, proper 23 in the three-year series A, and proper 11 in the three-year series B.

Behold, My Sheep, I Will Search You Out

1 Behold, My sheep, I’ll search you out,
Rescue on day of clouds;
Though through the darkness, scattered out,
From global nations, proud;
I Myself will make you lie down,
Gathering from the crowd

2 You, O My sheep, I’ll shepherd you,
On mountain heights to feed;
Good grazing land, ravines through too,
Satisfied without greed;
Strengthened, the weak and injured, bound,
Fed fully freed from need.

3 Thus says the Lord, the God of all,
My name has been profaned.
Yoked with the pagans, since the fall,
You have my anger gained.
But, in My faithfulness ‘gainst gall,
You will be unashamed.

4 Thus says the Lord, the God of all,
I will remove the stone,
Where your heart is, instead will fall,
Flesh in its place alone,
My law, this flesh will love it all,
I’ll bring you to your home.

5 Though your bones lie in valley, dry,
In your own flesh, you’ll stand;
Before My throne, in kingdom, high,
In congregation, grand;
Restored in flesh, Me in your eye,
All this by My command.

6 On the last day, your Graves, I’ll break,
People resting in faith,
By Jesus blood and for His sake,
My children, you, I make.
Thus You will know, I am the Lord,
I’ve spoken these words great.

TRUMPET BLAST; 86 86 86
Text, Tune, and Setting: Jason M. Kaspar, b. 1976;
Text: © 2023, Jason M. Kaspar;
Tune and Setting: © 2014, Jason M. Kaspar

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team:
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX

The Eighth Day

In a previous post, We talked about the significance of the sixth and seventh days, the day of preparation and the Sabbath, reinforcing the calculus of Jesus death and resurrection on the third day. The third day is also the eighth day. In Christianity, we make a big deal out of the eighth day as the day of resurrection. It’s the day of the proof of our salvation. Jesus paid for our sins through His death on the cross on Friday, the sixth day. His resurrection on the first day of the week, the eighth day, proves His victory over death and the grave.

1st Century Christians quickly began gathering together on the first day of the week. The shift from the Sabbath, seventh day to the first day, the eighth day, reflected our understanding from faith in a promise yet to be revealed to a promise of salvation delivered in Christ. The Resurrection happens on the “first day of the week.” (Matthew 28:1-6; Mark 16:1-6; Luke 24:1-7; John 20:1-18). We now call the first day of the week Sunday. That’s also the eighth day.

This less than exhaustive look at Old Testament eighth day theology reveals quite of few of these. The fall and protoevangelion (first Gospel), can be understood as eighth day events. We fall way, corrupting creation. And, God promises to restore us by the seed of the Woman. (Genesis 3)

God’s covenant with Abraham was sealed by eighth day activity too. As a sign of the covenant between God and Abraham’s offspring. Circumcision was to be performed on the eighth day. (Genesis 17:9-13) It’s prob’ly no accident that the Lord puts the sign of His promise on the eighth day. It’s as if we’re to be on the lookout for an eighth day event sometime soon.

Even the critters of the Jews are reflecting eighth day significance. The firstborn of all livestock are to be given to the Lord. Care to guess which day? Seven days with its mother, and it’s given to the Lord on the eighth day. (Exodus 22:29-30)

When Aaron and His sons or ordained for service in the tabernacle. The atonement for them and the altar is appointed for seven days. Beginning on the eighth day, they may serve in the tabernacle the offering for the sins of the people. (Exodus 29:35-37)

There are several rites within the Jewish Levitical code, which peculiar eighth day events. Leprosy was determined by two seven-day seclusions. (Leviticus 13:4-6) The cleansing of lepers revolves around the eighth day. (Leviticus 14) The feast of booths begins and ends with a sabbath convocation. The second on is called the eighth day. (Leviticus 23:36, 39)

Ezekiel prophesied in his vision of the new temple and the return of the glory of the Lord. The altar is to be erected and consecrated to the Lord. Seven days are appoint for the atonement of the altar. On the eighth day and following, the Lord will accept sacrifices for the people. (Ezekiel 43:18-27)

In the New Testament, Baptism becomes the fulfillment of the eighth day promise of circumcision. “In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead. And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross.” (Colossians 2:11-14)

The eighth day is the day of Christianity. It’s the day of resurrection. It’s the day of new birth in Jesus. The eighth day is now and not yet. Forgiven in Christ by grace through faith given in Baptism, we await the fulfillment on the last day, the final eight day.

We surround ourselves with eight-sided figures. Our baptismal fonts are often eight sided. The quadifoils surrounding gospel moments and characters in stained glass and vestments are even eight sided comprised of four arcs and four angles. The old European coffins were eight sided with six edges, a top, and a bottom. Church columns were often eight-sided. Other architectural features in the church may also assume an octagonal catechesis. They are a constant reminder of the promise of new birth, forgiveness, restoration, and resurrection to immortal life in Christ.

Jesus was raised on the eighth day.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team:
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX

On The Third Day

Modernists and restorationists often struggle with commonly accepted matters in the Christian faith. Often, we spill ink on the bodily presence of Jesus in the Lord’s Supper or the forgiveness and faith delivered in baptismal waters by God. But, for today, let’s look at the three days in the tomb.

Ancient Jewish timekeeping works in two important ways. The first is an inclusive reckoning. There was no concept of 4.3 days in their understanding. Part of a day is a day in this view. Second, their days didn’t begin or end as ours do. Our modern, western timekeeping reckons a day from morning through evening and into the night. Theirs reckoned a day from nightfall, thought the watches of the night, the hours of the day, and ending with nightfall again. “…There was evening and there was morning, the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth days.” (Genesis 1:5, 8,13, 19, 23, 31)

Jesus’s prediction of His death reinforces this idea. He speaks of the third day as movement through. Death occurs on the first day, and resurrection on the third day. He speaks of days inclusively. The death needn’t happen before the first day, nor the resurrection after the third day, even just by a few moments. That would be five days by this reckoning. “From that time Jesus began to show his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and on the third day be raised.” (Matthew 16:21) The inclusive view is consistent through the predictions elsewhere. (Matthew 17:22-23; 20:17-19; Luke 9:21-22; & John 2:19)

The outlier expressions “after three days” (Mark 9:31 & 10:34) and “three days and nights in the heart of the earth” (Matthew 12:40) are best understood within the context of preponderance of the texts. Inclusive language prevails. So, the other three examples are likely idiomatic in some way, not literal.

Speaking of the literal, Jesus literally died on Friday. He died about the ninth hour. (Matthew 24:50; Mark 15:34-37; & Luke 23:46) In Jewish timekeeping, there are 12 equal hours of the watches of the night from nightfall to dawn and 12 equal hours of daylight from dawn to the end of the day at nightfall. The sixth hour is noon. The ninth hour would be about three p.m. by our reckoning. That’s just before the calendar switches to Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, the seventh day.

Jesus was taken off the cross and buried “when evening came” “on the day of preparation” (Matthew 27:57-62; Mark 15:42-43; Luke 23:52-54; & John 19:42). This indicates the close of the day before nightfall. The day of preparation is the day preceding the Sabbath. “On the sixth day [Friday], when they prepare what they bring in, it will be twice as much as they gather daily. …See! The Lord has given you the Sabbath; therefore on the sixth day he gives you bread for two days. Remain each of you in his place; let no one go out of his place on the seventh day.” (Exodus 16:5, 29)

We can say Jesus died on the sixth day, Friday, before nightfall with great certainty thanks to St. John. “since it was the day of preparation, and so that the bodies would not remain on the cross on the Sabbath (for the Sabbath was a high day), the Jews asked Pilate that their legs might be broken and that they might be taken away. …But when they came to Jesus and saw that he was already dead, they did not break his legs.” (John 19:31, 33)

The seventh day, Saturday, is the day of rest and the end of the week. The Resurrection happens on the “first day of the week.” (Matthew 28:1-6; Mark 16:1-6; Luke 24:1-7; & John 20:1-18). We now call the first day of the week Sunday. The resurrection happened before dawn, in the watches of the night, on the first day of the week.

So, the bible clearly teaches us that Jesus died and was buried on Friday, before the calendar date flipped. He rose from the dead on Sunday, in wee hours before dawn, after the calendar date flipped. We received this both from the preponderance of evidence in expression and in the actual accounting of days and times. He lay in the tomb between about 26-36 hours. But, that span is exactly what He said, “on the third day.” Speaking to Jews in a Jewish manner of days and times. It was indeed nothing other than the third day as they would have understood it.

Christ is Risen!

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team:
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX

The Problem With Revivalism

The event, which recently wrapped-up at Asbury University, is called an outbreak by folks in those revivalist circles. “A student praying in the chapel broke out into”, “a prayer meeting the dormitory spilled out onto the streets and became”, or “a student’s testimony broke into a revival lasting [a number of] days.” That’s how the Asbury College website describes their own history of great revivals in 1905, 1908, 1921, 1950, 1958, 1970, and 2023. No mention is made of the lesser revivals that didn’t breakout adequately.

Who are these Asbury University folks?

They identify themselves as a nondenominational Christian college turned university. Nondenominational is a disingenuous category. There’s always a denominational precedent leaving its mark on the organization into the future. Typically that nondenominational root is Baptist. Not so for Asbury, they are product of the Wesleyan-Holiness Movement. The movement comes from a 19th Century mingling of Methodism, Quakerism, Anabaptism, and Restorationism.

The Holiness Churches reject infant baptism, infant faith, and the view that God creates faith in us (monergism). Instead, these churches teach a synergistic view that we generate faith within ourselves as an act of our will. This runs contrary to the clear teaching of Scriptures like “For by grace you have been saved through faith and this is not your own doing; It is a gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.” (Ephesians 2:8-9) And, “Yet you are he who took me from the womb; You made me trust you at my mother’s breasts. On you was I cast from my birth, and from my mother’s womb you have been my God.” (Psalm 22:9-10)

The Holiness crowd also places a strong emphasis on the “Second Work of Grace.” Namely, after coming to faith, a Christian is completely free from sin’s grip. In the future, Christian perfection is an achievable goal. This goal must be the aim of a Christian, and must be attained. Falling back into sin is a gross error within Holiness communities. When a regenerate Christian “backslides” into sin, they must repent, revive themselves, recommit, and often be rebaptized. This is where the revival aspect took root.

Charles Grandison Finney

Finney’s new measures centered upon revival meetings. His theology rejected the songs and liturgy of the church in favor of new musical styles and a different structure. This structure reversed the direction of corporate worship. Christian worship prior to Finney revolved around God’s gifts for His people and our receiving them.

The revivalist style and its substance revolve entirely upon the emotional excitement of the people gathered. Ramping that into a heightened fury is their evidence of the Holy Spirit at work. Apart from these events, the revivalists find no comfort or certainty in their faith, conversion, working of God in their lives, or even their salvation. The moment and surety of the their salvation, as they understand it, has a date and time concurrent with a revival event experience.

Is that a problem?

Yes, it is. Christianity revolves around a God, who promises Himself to us through means, in which He promised to deliver His gifts. In Baptism, God forgives sins and delivers faith. In the hearing of the Word, we receive faith. In the Lord’s Supper, we receive the forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation. The absence of our doing in the faith is a feature not a bug. The absence of our emotional proof of God’s work is a feature not a bug.

Revivalism rejects God’s work for us, replacing it with our work. The event earns God’s attention and His favor. The event is all about us and our doing. Our work and our feeling of the event are proof of God. This is the opposite of what the scriptures teach us.

God the Father sent His son Jesus to die for our sin. He delivers this to us extra nos, (outside of our selves). Looking inside, just reveals the sin that remains. Gathering to hear and receive from outside of ourselves in the Lord’s house is His work for us. He’s never been apart from His work for us. He’s always been in exactly the same place for you. There’s certainty here.even

Here is how Martin Luther Describes it:

The third article of the Apostles’ Creed – Sanctification.

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy Christian Church, the communion of Saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting. Amen.

What does this mean?

I believe that I cannot by my own reason or strength believe in Jesus Christ my Lord or come to him. But the Holy Spirit has called me by the gospel, enlightened me with His gifts, sanctified and kept me in the true faith. In the same way He calls, gathers, enlightens, and sanctifies the whole Christian Church on earth and keeps it with Jesus Christ in the one true faith. In this Christian Church He daily and richly forgives all my sins and the sins of all believers. On the last day He will raise up me and all the dead and will give eternal life to me and to all believers in Christ. This is most certainly true. (Luther’s Small Catechism 2:3, emphasis mine)

The Bottom line

The Holy Spirit isn’t in my emotions, which rise and fall, grow and fade. He is at work in His Word and sacraments. He’s in the same places He promised to be. The Holy Spirit was ceaselessly at work in His church for 1800 years before Finney discovered the “real” way and evidence of the Spirit.

Beware of innovators, God doesn’t change.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX

Charity, Charitability, Government, and the Needy

There will always be beggars among us in the church and throughout the world. The charitable work of the church is not on the decline. It is as vibrant as ever and even better organized than it has even been. But, our common understanding of it on the decline.

There are a few factors contributing to our own weaker view of the mercy work of the church. In some cases, community or ecumenical efforts have eclipsed congregational or synodical activities. Mostly, the bottomless pockets of government benefit programs are steadily pushing out private charity in our minds.

Government is the enemy of charity and charitability. It anonymizes the recipient, stealing the blessing of shame. That shame is a twofold gift. It can serve to motivate our neighbor to better themselves, escaping their situation. That shame can also fuel Christian gratitude toward the benefactor.

Government further compels benefactors to participate by the irresistible force of violence or incarceration. Instead of choosing charitable vehicles, the tax-paying benefactor sees their money go where political winds blow it. This compulsion breeds resentment. The resentment is a result of the immoral or evil purposes, graft and waste overshadowing the good. Further, the irresistible force can create a mentality akin to, “I already gave at the door.”

As Christians, we have a duty to provide for the good of the needy, “the widow and the orphan.” The first Christians saw this and the fairness of it as a critical need in the work of the church. To free-up the disciples in their ministry, St. Stephen and the others were set-up in works of mercy, serving their neighbor (Acts 6:1-7).

Now, the widow and the orphan are not exclusive terms and ought to be understood well among us. In ancient near eastern culture, widows and orphans were the most helpless of society. Women could not own property. Without a husband, father, or grown son, a woman’s only option outside of starvation would be prostitution. This harsh reality is the genesis of the St. Nicholas legends, providing dowries for destitute girls to be married instead.

Orphans were similarly hopeless in their plight. Without an inheritance or ability to find work, shelter, or food, voluntary slavery was one of the few options outside of begging. And, beggars on the streets were easy prey for all sorts of brigands and ne’er-do-wells.

These examples are particularly useful for us in our society. Widows and orphans are in less dire circumstances among us. But, the helplessness of the 1^st century folks gives us good guidance nonetheless. Those most in need are always here. For us, the disabled, the injured, and those impoverished by inescapable circumstance are like the widow and the orphan.

It can be easy for us to slip into a lazy charitability in different directions. Vehicular charity, government as charity, and indiscriminate charity are paths that can lead to giving that doesn’t benefit our neighbor.

First, we might insulate ourselves with vehicular charity through organizations, concealing the face and plight of the beggar. A bigger organization is often better in this way. Of course, we love to hear personalized stories of recipients, without knowing or seeing them in the flesh. It’s tidy and sanitary. We get a tax benefit and an emotional boost.

This isn’t evil. Giving via large organizations that are faithful in their service brings economics of scale into play. Those organizations can provide benefits to the needy that individuals and small organizations couldn’t muster. We can make it evil by hiding all of our charity here, excusing ourselves from other needs around us.

In a similar vein with the vehicular, we may fall into a notion that government programs cover the needs. “I pay my taxes, providing for the needy. Ergo, I need not give more or differently. ” The giving patterns of politicians are a strong example of this mindset. Many even give far less than the limits of tax benefits available, demonstrating a great lack of charitability.

When this mindset is true, it is evil.

The last, indiscriminate charity can be directly harmful to the beggar. I once ran across a woman who reported an example as normative in her giving. “This man, an obvious alcoholic, had a really detailed story. His story was so good, that I gave him $20. I know he was gonna buy booze. But, it was a great story. I’ll always give to a good storyteller.”

That kind of giving is harmful charity. The beggar is absolutely causing themselves harm by the gift. Your gift in this case is no different than a bat across the face. When we give, knowing the gift is likely to cause, increase, or encourage self-harming behaviors, the gift is evil.

In the church, we have a particular responsibility towards each other. Our charity toward each other in the congregation is some of the most personal and faithful giving we do. Charity toward the lazy is more obvious in our midst. St. Paul warns us against this. “Now we command you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is walking in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us… For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat. For we hear that some among you walk in idleness, not busy at work, but busybodies. Now such persons we command and encourage in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their work quietly and to earn their own living.” (2 Thessalonians 3:6,10-12)

Here our neighbor is dwelling outside the 7^th commandment. They are compelling the congregation to give to them without genuine need. This is easy enough to discern. A person who can work, but won’t, deserves no charity. They are not just stealing from their benefactors. They are also stealing from those among us and outside our gathering in genuine need. We should not disregard the “widow and the orphan,” those without means or ability to provide for themselves in favor of the lazy.

Let our charity always help our neighbor, and never harm!

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team:
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX

Eulogies Aren’t Just Bad

Many of us have been to that funeral. The one where the deceased is the center of the show. Maybe it was called a “celebration of life.” Or, the thing was intended to be the happy event because everybody’s always so sad at funerals. In the service, we heard a eulogizing message that made little or no mention of Jesus. It certainly didn’t speak of what wondrous things Jesus has done and is doing for Aunt Gertrude. There was no talk of Uncle Jurgen’s rest in Christ, or the promised resurrection on the last day.

To be clear, I’m not talking about reminiscing together. I’m not talking about a glowing obituary, or even a public reading of it. I’m talking about those quasi-hagiographies that elevate the deceased above the character of a sinner, saved for Jesus’s sake, by no merit of their own. These are on the doorstep of idolatry.

In talking about the funeral, you might hear something like, “The resurrection of all flesh?” What use is that to say? This is a celebration of life! We’re taking comfort in who Gertrude was.” Or, “How will people know who Jurgen was? Someone has to talk about him, so the people get to know him. They need to know what he was like.”

That is grief talking. In the resurrection, we will be with all the faithful, including Gertrude and Jurgen. They are at rest. They’re not gone forever. They are awaiting the resurrection, having been delivered from this tribulation. “I said to him, ‘Sir, you know.’ And he said to me, ‘These are the ones coming out of the great tribulation. They have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.’” (Revelation 7:14)

Eulogies can be bad, when they’re false. It’s one thing to dwell on the highlights of a person’s life in their obituary. It’s entirely another to glorify their character beyond reality. “Gertrude was the kindest person anyone ever met.” “Jurgen was so selfless, no one ever had a cross word to say about him.” We’re talking about a sinner like us, with warts and weaknesses aplenty. Today, unlike us, they are free from sin today. Yesterday, they were not.

Eulogies can be worse, when they distract from the person and work of Jesus. The hagiographic problem rears its head in its dominance over our dead loved one’s savior, Jesus. The Gospel should always have predominance. This means that the kind words and remembrances of Gertrude or Jurgen ought not be greater in number, longer in presentation, or bolder in proclamation than the work of their Lord, Jesus Christ.

Eulogies can be wicked, when they deny the current state of blissful rest. This falls into the land of in-a-better-place-ism. “Jesus called her home, because He needed another angel.” “He has gone to a better place.” Neither of these are true, as we’ve discussed before. The dead in Christ are at rest in Him. “Then they were each given a white robe and told to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brothers should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves had been.” (Revelation 6:11)

Eulogies are evil, when they deny the fleshly resurrection. We’ll hear about how Jurgen is freed from suffering. He’s done with his body now. The first statement is true and good. The latter is false and anti-Christian. The promise, given to us in baptism with the faith to trust in that promise, is salvation and resurrection. This isn’t an innovative teaching. Christianity has confessed the resurrection throughout the ages. Modern Christians are the ones returning to ancient heresies, like denying the resurrection. See also: Acts 6:6-8, 1 Corinthians 15:12-20, Job 19:23-27, and John 11:23-25.

Concerning the right use of Eulogies, “A eulogy is not the best Christian tradition. An obituary may be read that focuses on the gospel promise of salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ our Lord and not on the good deeds of the deceased. It might be appropriate for family and friends to say a few words about the beloved in a more casual setting, such as a reception or family gathering after the service.” (Final Victory, p. 47, Bryan Wolfmueller, CPH, 2009).

Praise be to Jesus, the Firstborn of the Dead!

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team:
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX

As the head of my household, can I commune my family?

No, you should not. And the why matters here. The notion of community enjoyed by Christians in fellowship together is governed by the Law of Christian love for my neighbor. Yes, love is a function of God’s Law. God’s love for you is purely the Gospel of undeserved forgiveness through the blood of Jesus. But, His command for you to love your neighbor and your compliance with it is purely a function of God’s Law.

Fourth commandment – “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the LORD your God is giving you.” (Exodus 20:12 ESV) “Honor your father and your mother, as the LORD your God commanded you, that your days may be long, and that it may go well with you in the land that the LORD your God is giving you.” (Deuteronomy 5:16)

“What does this mean? We should fear and love God so that we do not despise or anger our parents and other authorities, but honor them, serve and obey them, love and cherish them.” (Luther’s Small Catechism, section 1:4)

Luther’s expansion of the commandments in the small catechism is taken directly from Jesus’s teaching of the commandments in Matt 5. Jesus condemns lust just as adultery and hatred just as murder. We are right to understand all of the commandments in a similar way.

As the head of a household, you bring your family into a church. By joining fellowship with that church, you are submitting yourself to her authority. You may only resist or reject, if that church operates in a way that is contrary to God’s Word. If your conscience so compels you, you ought also to leave that church and find a faithful one.

However, under the authority of that church, you are bound to her governance. This is not different than children, who are bound to the governance of their parents. The voluntary nature of our submission is the only unique feature here. If we are Christians in a particular place, then we are bound by God’s law to that body unless or until we sever ourselves from it.

This is also true of a congregation’s relationship to District and Synod. We do not have the moral authority to disregard synodical doctrine and practice. In our voluntary association with a synod, we are bound by the 4th Commandment to submit ourselves to that governance. If we are to deviate from it, we are also bound to separate ourselves from that synod.

Now, getting back home, my household is a member of a local congregation. This congregation is a member congregation of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod. We believe teach and confess that the institution of the Lord’s Supper belongs to the church as a whole and ought to be governed and conducted in good order.

Our teaching springs from Jesus’s institution of the Lord’s Supper among the twelve disciples (Matthew 26, Mark 16, Luke 22). It’s important to recognize that there were other groupings of followers throughout Jesus’s ministry. Jesus sent out seventy-two to proclaim the nearness of the Kingdom of God (Luke 10). St. Paul also reports that there were over 500 witnesses to the resurrection in the 40 days Jesus walked the earth before the Ascension (1 Corinthians 15).

Yet, none of these received the institution of the Lord’s Supper or the command to go and make disciples of all nations. That work, the governance of it, and passing of it to others was left for the disciples to manage. That’s the work of the church. We are to conduct ourselves in good order and submit ourselves to faithful governance within the church.

The particular articles governing us as members of member congregations of the LC–MS are these. “Our churches teach that the one holy Christian Church is to remain forever. The church is the congregation of Saints in which the Gospel is purely taught and the sacraments are correctly administered…” (Augsburg Confession, Article: VII). “Our churches teach that no one should publicly teach in the church, or administer the sacraments, without a rightly ordered call” (AC XIV).

In voluntary Fourth Commandment submission to the authority of our congregations and their synodical governance, we cannot practice the Lord’s Supper apart from the administration of those pastors, who are rightly called to do so. We are certainly free to leave the fellowship in search of a faithful one, if we are so driven by our conscience. But, we cannot pretend to submit to the church’s authority publicly, and privately rebel against her.

That would be unfaithful to God’s commands for us. God’s Word requires that we hear and obey. That includes submitting to those authorities He has given us. As we each confessed in our confirmations, I will suffer all, even death, rather than fall away from this faith.

As we confess, so let us do.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team:
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX