
Do you remember our Lutheran churches teeming with life? Do you remember infants, children, young people, young families, and folks of all ages? To some degree or another most of us remember the better times that preceded our current season in the church. From our demographic peak in the LCMS around 1970 and right now, each year has been less populous than the one before. Now that I’ve turned the corner of 50, I remember very well the church in about the middle of that decline, which was far better than today.
In order to look clearly at the individual partial causes, we need to look clearly at the broad demographic change. Someone will certainly look at this data and its analysis, finding offense. I intend no offense, nor personal criticism. However, we cannot hide our heads in the sand in the face of evidence which must be acknowledged.
Around 1970, the LCMS consisted of about 2.79 million members, dispersed among around 5,745 congregations, at an average of 485 per congregation, with Sunday attendance around 180. These congregations had 1,400 parochial elementary schools distributed among them, with 156,000 pupils, averaging 111 per school.
Around 2025, the LCMS consisted of about 1.67 million members (-40%), dispersed among around 5,794 congregations (+1%), at an average of 288 per congregation (-40%), with Sunday attendance around 95 (-47%). These congregations had 660 parochial elementary schools distributed among them (-47%). The number of pupils for parochial elementary schools isn’t readily available since that current data has been mingled with early childcare center (ECC) data. But, we can extrapolate in the most generous way. Using the 111 per school average, which is certainly higher than the current average, there are no more than 74,000 pupils among our parochial elementary schools (consistent with the 47% decline).
While that’s dire data, it’s common among American Christian churches. In particular, our neighbors in the ELCA have seen a 49% drop between 1988 & 2024, compared to our 40% drop from 1970-2025. The exception here is the sudden growth within the Roman and Eastern Orthodox churches.
(Data sourced by Grok AI using: concordiatheology.org, thearda.com, adcrucem.news.org, christiancyclopedia.org, & 2026 convention lcms.org)
We are recipients of a perfect storm: a birth rate problem, interfaith marriage, parochial elementary school closures, urbanization, and sheep poaching.
The same problem we are observing nationally also affects the LCMS, the Texas District, Circuit 23, and our own congregation. The replacement birth rate is 2.1 children per woman. That means family sizes of 1 to 3 kids, calculated together with all of the zeros, like my family, put our synodical birth rate below 2.1. That has caused, and will continue to cause, our churches to shrink. Church population increases primarily by birth rate, not by conversion. Now, combine that with the known retention rate of 67% when Dad brings kids to church by himself, and 39% when Mom brings children to church by herself, and we get a colony collapse level of reduction.
Interfaith marriage was once loosely forbidden among us Lutherans in the LCMS. I’ve even heard anecdotal reports of parents forbidding dating outside the Wendish community in central Texas. That devolved into requiring a suitor to convert to the LCMS. Then, commending the kids to find a faithful Christian, someone who goes to church, someone who’s at least Christian, someone who “believes,” and so forth. We have raised up at least two generations of Christian families without attendance habits in the better examples. In worse cases, kids are left to decide for themselves whether to follow Mom’s, Dad’s, or no faith tradition. Spoiler: most of those kids choose apostasy (falling away from the faith), agnosticism, or atheism.
During this same timeframe, we’ve closed 47% of our parochial elementary schools. Parochial education is the forward-facing loss to the church. We’ve also lost the community impact of professional church workers. Even a tiny school with two teachers could easily inject ten or more committed Lutherans into a church and a town. That impact is especially strong in rural and small-town communities.
The quality of education is another concealed loss. Propagandists question the quality of parochial and homeschool education. Another spoiler: parochial and homeschool students consistently outperform public school students. For the families that can access it, private school is a far better option.
For a time, Sunday School became a standard feature of our churches. (We borrowed the concept of Sunday School from the Methodists, who had no parochial elementary school tradition). While it’s a laudable side item, Sunday school doesn’t begin to fill the void left by closing a parochial elementary school.
What about preschools? ECCs are a good service for us to provide. But they do not have an effect on the vitality of a congregation like that of a parochial elementary school. It’s also unfair of us to expect a similar effect from such a narrow span of time and such a distant memory for the kids involved.
We also suffer from urbanization. Humans tend to follow employment opportunities, which often revolve around cities. For rural and small-town churches and their communities, the migration depletes our stock of young families. It’s an unstoppable force. Outside of industry setting up shop in our area, there’s very little that can be done in that fight.
Even in these massive urban centers, sheep poaching is still a problem. You may have noticed that Lutheran mega-churches are practically non-existent in rural and small-town areas. In urban metro areas (Houston, San Antonio, Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Denver, Chicago, et al.), large congregations can and have grown to enormous size by directly or indirectly, deliberately or accidentally, poaching members from competing congregations.
These churches will often cite the “unchurched” in their membership numbers. That’s not entirely accurate. For the most part, these unchurched folks are members/former members of local neighborhood congregations, who’ve been drawn in by the big show. The megachurch has a well-documented membership life cycle: discovery, membership, involvement, volunteerism, burnout, and departure. The sad aspects of that cycle are these: most new members come from recent activity at an existing congregation. The average span of membership is about five years. And, worst of all, people departing tend to leave Christianity altogether. The megachurch system is largely a vacuum, sucking people from neighborhood churches into apostasy.
What can we do? Start evangelism programs, youth groups, or outreach events? Those external activities came into Lutheranism amid the steady decline. They changed nothing at that time, when they were the “bigger, better” new deal.
Is this a hopeless situation? Certainly not. We have good metrics to help us reverse some trends. There aren’t enough children. We need to encourage marrying young, remaining faithful, and having lots of babies. Consider this: informally adopt a young family in your church. Buy them some groceries. Give them some gas money. Help mothers caring for their children. Encourage and chastise fathers to lead their families to church. Establish and fund a parochial elementary school, with a generous active-member family discount. Use that as a “bribe” to bring in and retain families in church attendance during the elementary years. Focus on the central part of Christianity: Sunday morning worship. That’s the actual prize, the unique feature of the faith. That’s where the Lord gathers us in His presence, delivers the forgiveness of sins, and strengthens us in the faith. The house of the Lord is where Christianity dwells.
The times are tough, but not hopeless,
Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
©2026 Jason M. Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@msn.com


