Author: Jason Kaspar

Bumper sticker theology always falls flat.  There was a commercial on the Superb Owl* this past weekend.  The HeGetsUs campaign ran an ad consisting of 12 four second images and two closing title cards.  The cards read “Jesus didn’t preach hate” & “He washed feet.”  With such little information contained in the ad, there is so much to unpack. 

(*copyright safe term for the big game)

The promoting organization is a conservative Baptist Christian group to the best of my knowledge.  The problems I see may or may not be deliberate.  But that’s the dilemma with bumper sticker theology.  What’s not said can be as important or more important than what is said.

Step one, let me offer a few quick impressions of the four second images.  These flash by so quickly that we’re invited to make snap judgements.  Some of them are nonsensical and contain no discernable conflict.  I’ll ignore those.  These images have an AI, hyper realistic look to them, which creates the possibility that the ghost in the machine may have added unknown or unintended details.  Still, you can’t unring a bell or unsee a picture.

The second image is two men in an alley at night.  The black man standing is sweaty and sort of disheveled.  The Hispanic cop is washing the other man’s feet on a dairy crate.  The flashing lights indicate a foot pursuit.  The cop’s expression is submissive, though sour in some way.  The standing man has a dominant position and expression.

The sixth image shows two women of similar age, seated abruptly on a kitchen floor.  Alcohol bottles, empty and unfinished alike, surround the unkempt one.  This image shows more discernable emotion than others.  The unkempt lady seems to be in distress.  The other woman seems to be giving comfort.

The eighth image has two women in front of a bus.  This one is politically charged.  The older, white woman has a look of reticent compliance, attentive to her washing task.  The Hispanic woman, standing on one foot, holding a baby looks indignant and entitled.  She seems to think she deserves the service.

The tenth image is emotionally charged.  The backing cast is full of intensity and screaming.  The Hispanic woman getting her feet washed is the only calm figure.  The black woman doing the washing wears an expression of pure condescension.  It’s unclear what is going on here.  But the conflict is still raging.

Step two, I want to look more closely at the two images that grab the most attention with their austerity.  The pregnancy clinic and the beach side bench are central to the ad.  The lack of additional detail in these two images draws our attention more closely.  They more quickly throw out a claim.

The fifth image shows two women in front of a pregnancy clinic that’s totally not Planned Parenthood (wink).  This image is significant to the ad.  It has much less going on.  There are protesters and a seedy motel in the background.  The younger women appears to be pregnant, with a steeled, serious expression.  The older woman is focused on her washing task.

This image is the opposite of repentance.  The image shows an excuse, “I didn’t really want to cause a pregnancy in that seedy motel.”  It shows an unfair opposition.  The protesters are just mean people, who don’t care/love enough.  The morally superior woman washing the pregnant gal’s feet doesn’t seem to be doing a moral good.  The clinic is a murder mill.  The pregnant woman shows no indication of a change of intention.

The twelfth image is an austere beachside setting.  Here a deliberately homosexual looking man gets his feet washed by an obvious clergyman.  The setting invites us to see nothing but the action.  A priest is symbolically baptizing sin into righteousness.  This one is the most egregious of the pile.

This foot washing is an image of the failure of the progressive church.  The Law condemns sin and the Gospel forgives repentant sinners.  Mingling them together into an acceptance of sin as it is, destroys both the Law and the Gospel, leaving us with nothing.

Third, the title cards say, “Jesus didn’t preach hate” & “He washed feet.”  This a non sequitur, the two statements don’t follow one from the other.  No, Jesus didn’t preach hate.  That’s not permission to love, permit, declare righteous, or embrace old sins.  In addition to whipping money changers in the temple in His anger, don’t forget Jesus preaching this.

“Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.  For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.  And a person’s enemies will be those of his own household.  Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.  And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me.  Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. (Matthew 10:34-39)

Faith and unbelief will clash.  God wants all to come to faith.  But, some will not have Him.  That recalcitrant, hateful unbelief earns God’s condemnation.  Preaching against sin is what love actually sounds like.  “I have loved you,” says the Lord. But you say, “How have you loved us?” “Is not Esau Jacob’s brother?” declares the Lord. “Yet I have loved Jacob but Esau I have hated. I have laid waste his hill country and left his heritage to jackals of the desert.” (Malachi 1:2-3). The unbelief of Edom separated them from God.

It’s only in Jesus that we find forgiveness and redemption.  He comes with forgiveness and says “go forth and sin no more.”  The work of the church can only ever identify sin, condemn it, and point to Jesus for faith and forgiveness.

Something else isn’t Christianity.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX

©2024 Jason Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@gmail.com

Encore Post: Every year we Christians are inundated with claims that December 25th isn’t the right day for Christmas, that Christianity co-opted pagan festival dates as their own, that all of the church calendar was a marketing scheme to pull pagans into different celebrations and convert them. These claims are not true. They are manufactured to sow doubt.

December 25th is a very accurate date for celebrating Christ’s birth. Christians initially celebrated the birth of Jesus on the same day as the Easter Triduum. (Triduum means three days, namely Maundy Thursday, Good Friday, and the Vigil of Easter). This stemmed from an early church practice of recognizing a saint’s death date as the same date of their birth. The ancients seemed to like the symmetry of it.

When Christianity began to recognize Christ’s birth as a different day, the dates in December popped up quite quickly. Hippolytus of Rome argued for December 25th, in the early 200s AD. St. John Chrysostom seems to have closed additional discussion, declaring December 25th the right date in the 300s AD. There is a reasonable amount of data that supports the claim.

Zechariah served in the temple with his kinsmen, the sons of Abijah. They served in the 8th month of the Jewish year. Nissan, the 1st month, falls between early March and early April, and identifies the moveable feast of Easter. The 8th month falls between mid-October and mid-November.

Now while he was serving as priest before God when his division was on duty, according to the custom of the priesthood, he was chosen by lot to enter the temple of the Lord and burn incense… And when his time of service was ended, he went to his home. After these days his wife Elizabeth conceived, and for five months she kept herself hidden, saying, “Thus the Lord has done for me in the days when he looked on me, to take away my reproach among people.” (Luke 1:8-9, 23-25)

After these days, Elizabeth conceived. We’ll assume an earlier date within the window, as the church fathers likely did. So, Elizabeth conceives around October 25th. Now, we leap forward to the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy and find this in the text.

And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy—the Son of God. And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. For nothing will be impossible with God.” And Mary said, “Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her. In those days Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country, to a town in Judah, and she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth. (Luke 1:35-40)

Mary conceives around March 25th. Then she visits Elizabeth, who is in the sixth month. John the Baptizer will be born around June 25th. Six months more will bring us to the next event.

And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling cloths and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn. And in the same region there were shepherds out in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. (Luke 2:6-8)

Jesus’s birth on December 25th is a thoroughly reasonable estimate. Early Christians’ selection of the date of Jesus’s birth seems to have been primarily influenced by the scriptures and some simple mathematics. Now, the date may not be entirely accurate. There are around 30 days of wiggle room in the start of the calculation. But, December 25th is the right time of year. It’s at least very close to the right day, if not exactly correct, which is also possible.

While a different day could be plausible, I’d suggest that a theoretical discussion is fruitless. A claim against December 25th needs to pass three bars. Name a day. Without a particular day in place of December 25th, the discussion is moot. Having named a day, back it up in the calendar calculations. If the alternate day suggested doesn’t fit the calendar math, we’re not getting anywhere. With a day in mind and calendar back-up, cite the opinions of Church fathers. The fathers were less than a quarter of the time away from events of Christ’s life compared to us. Without the backing of more Church fathers than the Christmas Day we know, it’s just and argument for argument’s sake.

Dear Christians, let us prepare our hearts and rejoice at our Savior’s birth.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church
& Preschool
La Grange, TX
and
Mission planting pastoral team:
Epiphany Lutheran Church
Bastrop, TX

©2020 Jason Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@gmail.com.

In speaking of a song or a book, we might say, “well, it’s Christian.”  Or, we might say of a potential spouse for our child, “at least they are a Christian.”  Perhaps we might glorify a church down the road, in a neighboring town, or a neighboring county, “it’s a Christian church.”  We speak as if there’s a thing, visibly, tangibly Christian without more specificity.

Dear Christians, there is no generic “Christian” church, teaching, or publishing source for books or songs.  Every church, teaching, or published work produced by Christendom flows from a sectarian root.  [Sectarian – member or adherent of a sect or division within a larger, generic whole].  Since no later than 1054 A.D., there is no unified, generic Christian whole.  In that year, the six patriarchs of the Eastern Christian church and the Patriarch (Pope) of Rome parted ways.

There were certainly schisms before that too.  Since that day though, the history of Christianity is schism.  Even within the Eastern Orthodox church, Russian and Ukrainian Orthodox Christians and their governments will have nothing to do with each other.  We would be hard pressed to discern a difference from outside.  Even in the Roman tradition we see divisions between Eastern rite and Western rite Catholics; between pre-Vatican II and post-Vatican II parishioners and priests.

Still, American non-Catholic Christians have grown nose-blind to the reality that we “protestants” are not the same either.  Even within Martin Luther’s lifetime the radical reformers rejected images, vestments, hymnody, and the sacraments.  Both Luther and the Lutheran reformers who followed him charted an initially narrow path between Rome and the Reformed Christians.

Cue the Jeff Foxworthy meme commonly shared in October and November: “If your Roman Catholic friends think you’re a Baptist, and your Baptist friends think you’re Catholic, you might be a Lutheran.”  Comedically, that meme draws attention to a glaring sectarianism within Christianity.  This may or may not be a good thing.  But, it is unavoidable.  On this side of the eschaton, we will not see a unified Christianity.  [Eschaton – end of the world, last things, end of days]

Flashing forward into the current age, all “Christian” churches come from a sectarian root.  The root does indeed matter.  A Pentecostal rooted church will look for divine revelation apart from the Scriptures and a concurrent experience of the divine to back it up.  A Calvinist Reformed rooted church will reject Jesus’ atoning death for the sins of all.  A Baptist rooted church will reject Baptismal regeneration, infant faith, the verbal absolution, and the bodily presence of Christ in the Lord’s Supper.

Each of those groups may produce a church calling itself “Christian.”  We should always ask, “what kind of Christian do you mean?”  Their position on the sacraments, speaking in tongues, the atonement, and the like will identify their sectarian root.

It’s good to be honest.  We are better neighbors to each other when our churches say what they are and from whence they come.  “Who are you and who’s your daddy?”  We all have God as our Father.  Still, our Earthly Fathers color our beliefs and teachings as grown folks.

Each town, city, and county in this nation is littered with confusingly named churches.  Whether it’s a Christian Fellowship, Cross Community Center, just Christian Church, Point of Grace Church, or any place claiming nondenominationality, know that’s just not so.  The church has a root from which they spring.  Their intent maybe to be welcoming or inclusive.  The result is a sheep-stealing mess that doesn’t say what it is.

When you see books, bible studies, and songs published by Zondervan, Eerdmans, Moody, IVP, Vladimir Press, CPH, Tyndale, Lifeway, or Ave Maria, know that they have a firmly held theological position.  The books, studies, and music they publish must fit that theological ethos.

When you engage with Christians of other sorts, know that they fervently hold beliefs contrary to your own.  In Christian love, you ought to be trying to convince them of their error.  They will certainly be doing the same with you, if they have love for you.  The scriptures are clear in their teachings.  We have the pure doctrine from the Word of God right here in the Lutheran Church.

Until the day when the Lord returns, hold fast to what you have learned.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

©2023 Jason Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@gmail.com

That’s just an attention-grabbing title.  I absolutely DID NOT have a vision from God.  But, I spoke with a person who claims just that.  Not only that they had a vision.  But, that the vision exposed Jesus’ will for Christians.  Furthermore, they were to share with revelation with everybody.

Now, you might wonder what this matters to us.  It is a direct concern for Christianity in our constant plight to seek only truth and purge error.  The summary, rule, and norm of the Christian faith is the Holy Scriptures.  Everything we believe teach and confess flows from that.  The bible is also the cornerstone upon which heresy is dashed to pieces.

You may recall a story from a brother or sister in Christ, who had a positive, christianish supernatural experience.  Maybe they felt the passing of the presence of a loved one, who had just died miles away.  Perhaps, there was a vision of an angel.  Or, they may have had a near-death experience seeing deceased loved-ones and Jesus. These dreams or visions have internally consistent proofs.

The loved ones look and speak like themselves.  The angels are warm and loving.  The Jesus just looks perfectly peaceful.  They appear in a lighted scene, surrounded by light, clouds, or unidentified people.

The errors abound.  Grandma and Grandpa in a loving embrace in a place where “they neither marry nor are given away in marriage.” (Mark 12:25)  The appearance of angels that aren’t terrifying like all of the ones in the scriptures.  A Jesus recognizable by His warmth or something, instead of His wounds. (John 20:24-29)

When pressed, the vision/dream reporters will say some thing like, “I just knew.”  Or, “I felt this over whelming peace.”  Or, “I knew it was Him when he spoke.”  All the proofs are internal.  The technical term for this is “self-referential.” You cannot refute a truth that doesn’t have an external proof or source.  My feelings, sensations, or internally secret knowledge are above reproach.

What’s the harm?  You might ask.  I pray there is none.  And, I’m quick to give this option.  It was the pious imagination of a Christian expecting to see good things.  The good things aren’t right in your imagination.  But, no harm, no foul, ja? I recently had an interaction of a darker sort with a person.  Their identity will remain hidden to conceal their sin.

The person said, “My being in the presence of the LORD happened [in a near death event], and Jesus Christ was in front of me, with arms outstretched, face aglow with love, welcoming me. The scene was like the garden of Gethsemane and the tree branches formed a tunnel; I experienced a peace beyond words. Jesus was emanating a soft, warm glow … People I knew were there, and some I didn’t, and they were so content, just standing together, waiting I suppose for the new Earth.”

This has many of the hallmarks of a vision/dream as we’ve heard before.  The warmth, the glow, the people, the tranquil scene, and the sense of peace. So far this isn’t horribly bad.  It’s prob’ly untrue.  But, there’s no harm just yet.

Buckle up, buttercup! The person next said, “Jesus was emanating a soft, warm glow and without moving his lips, I received kind of a blast of information, and I also got a glimpse of Heaven.  People I knew were there, and some I didn’t, and they were so content, just standing together, waiting I suppose for the new Earth.  In the midst of them was my [gay uncle, who] loved the LORD.”

Now, we’re entering the danger zone.  This unscarred “jesus” speaks without words.  He’s delivering secret knowledge.  Put your Christian ear protection on quickly in these situations. “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.” (2 Timothy 3:16-17)  Nothing in the scriptures is wrong, outmoded, or abrogated.

“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.” (1 John 4:1-3)  Everything claiming Christianity must agree with the Word of God and confess Jesus as Lord and Savior.

“And if you say in your heart, ‘How may we know the word that the Lord has not spoken?’—  when a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the Lord has not spoken; the prophet has spoken it presumptuously. You need not be afraid of him.” (Deuteronomy 18:21-22)  Be on guard, test visions, dreams, or prophecies with the scriptures.

Any claimed Jesus or angel will never speak against the revealed Word. If this “jesus” doesn’t look like the revealed Jesus, bearing the marks of your salvation by which He’s know, be on guard. If this “jesus” disagrees with the actual Jesus, beware.

The person then said, “The first thing Jesus Christ said was ‘you don’t have to be perfect’, and that He isn’t concerned about sexuality; He accepts those who know Him as their LORD and Savior and his concern is about self righteousness , and the lack of love we have for one another.” Is this consistent with what Jesus actually said? No, it’s not.

Matthew 5:17-18 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.”  You do have to be perfect, if you expect to earn salvation.  Jesus was perfect, without sin or error.  Ministering to sinners, tax collectors, and prostitutes, He forgave their sin.  And He told them to “sin no more.”

St. Paul also teaches in the Word of God at the end of his lengthy diatribe about salvation by faith not works, “Do we then overthrow the law by this faith? By no means! On the contrary, we uphold the law.” (Romans 3:31)

This person specifically attacked Leviticus for condemning homosexuality, which is true.  It’s is God’s Word and it does.  But, does the New Testament speak that way too?  Let’s test the spirits.  “Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)  Homosexuality is specifically included in the list of vices from which Christians must flee.

St. Paul also teaches in the Word of God according to 1 Timothy 1:8-11 “Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.”

When, not if, we transgress the Law, we remain in need of forgiveness and the command “Go and Sin no more.”  Love can never embrace or encourage sin of any sort.  Homosexuality is absolutely included here.  In forgiveness, we are to turn away from it like all other sin and vice.

The person finally said, “After being in His presence on another occasion, I was compelled to somehow get that message, which isn’t some new revelation, across to those around me, including the LCMS.” This wasn’t pious imagination.  This certainly wasn’t Jesus speaking.  This man was likely visited by a demon.  I can say this because the demon’s words are consistent with the Devil’s temptation in the garden.  “[The Serpent/Satan] said to the woman, ‘Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’’?” (Genesis 3:1) If your vision disagrees with scripture, it is false.  This one does.  And, it is false.

But, it sounded “right” from the start.  That’s true danger, dear Christians.  Looking for a revelation from God apart from His revealed Word invites all manner of evil into our hearts and minds.

Now, some visons or dreams may be true.  German Lutheran pastors have been reporting Muslims coming to them because of Jesus’ instruction them in dreams.  Now, these dreams are reported to be troubling and frightening.   In the dreams, Jesus tells them to go to a certain place at a certain time and speak to a certain priest.  In hesitant fear, the people comply, learning about the true Jesus, and converting to Christianity.

That conversion can be a death sentence. The difference here is that the dream leads directly to the external truth.  The Jesus in these dreams tells the dreamers to go to where they will learn of Him.  No secrets or hidden truths are given; just a command: go and hear.

In many and various ways, God spoke to his people of old by the prophets.

But now in these last days, he has spoken to us by his son. (Hebrews 1:1-2a; LSB 238)

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

©2023 Jason Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@gmail.com

I’ve recently written two articles. First, the LCMS and those in our global fellowship are the only right teaching church. And, some non-Lutherans will surely go to heaven, but we’ll all be Lutheran in heaven. Now, there are folks calling themselves Christians who will not go to heaven.

False Teachers and those who firmly believe their demonstrably false teaching are prob’ly not going to heaven.

Concerning diseased trees who will be known by their bad fruits, Jesus says, “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’” (Matthew 7:21-23)

Jesus says about false teachers, “Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me, but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” (Matthew 18:5-6) We are all to trust what we hear like little children, trust the words of our father and mother. But woe to those leading any astray. The depths of the sea are for Satan and His minions, miscreants, and myrmidons. “Then a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea.” (Revelation 18:21a) The Dragon, the great serpent, who is the Devil belongs there in the sea.

Francis Pieper warns strongly about continually, knowingly, teaching falsely because others have done the same. “Over against such notions we need to perceive clearly and to maintain firmly that the “felicitous inconsistency,” through which by the grace of God an erring Christian is kept from losing his personal faith, in no way extenuates the error, much less legitimizes it. Those who defend their false teaching by citing the case of pious erring fathers are reminded by Luther of a possible eventuality: they follow the pious fathers indeed, but will not be with them at the end. Teaching in the House of God, the church, is a most serious matter. The teachers of the church must never forget: 1. Scripture nowhere gives any man the license to deviate in any point from God’s Word.”

Point one is very clear. When God’s Word refutes the existence of female “pastors,” the denial of infant faith, the denial of the real physical presence of Christ for the forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation in the Lord’s Supper, the denial of two genders given to us by God from creation, the denial of Jesus’ full forgiveness by the words of your pastor, and the like, there is no room in Christianity for a false teacher unless they repent and turn from their sin. Yet false teachers persist in their refuted error.

“… 2. Every departure from the Word of Christ, as found in the Word of His Apostles, is expressly designated an offense. Romans 16:17: ‘Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them.’” When we hear false teachers, we must call out the error. Furthermore, we must also withdraw ourselves and our families from the false teaching.

“… 3. Everyone who rejects the testimony of scripture concerning one doctrine, actually, though he is not fully aware of it, invalidates the Christian principle of [inerrancy].” It is impossible to deny a “small area” of doctrine. All of the scriptures are breathed out by God. There is no shady spot for a teacher, a student of God’s Word, to hide themselves in a known rejection of God’s Word.

“… 4. Finally, we should always bear in mind that, like sin in the sphere of morality, so every error in the sphere of doctrine has the tendency to spread and to infect other doctrines with its virus.” The false teaching of false teachers is an infection in Christianity. It spreads like a virus, damaging all the tissues in the Body of Christ that it touches. The only solutions for Christianity are avoidance, treatment, or surgery. (All four quotes: Francis Pieper, Christian Dogmatics, Volume I, p. 89-91, © 1950, CPH, St. Louis, MO)

Avoidance keeps us and our families away from the infection of false teaching. Treatment seeks to cure the infection with repentance and renewal in the faith, away from false teaching. Surgery severs us from the false teaching/teachers by removing them from us and our families.

Stay tuned, there is still more: does a “Christian Church” exist?

Close your ears to false teachers, dear Christians.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

©2023 Jason Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@gmail.com

Do you think only Lutherans are going to heaven?

On the heels of my writing that the LCMS and those in our global fellowship are the only right teaching church, folks will hastily and uncharitably say things like, “I bet you think only Lutherans are going to heaven!”  or “Pastor’s gonna be surprised that there aren’t only Lutherans in Heaven.”

Of course, that’s neither what I believe nor what I teach.  We think of ourselves as smart and witty when popping off like that.  “There you sit, like butter in sunshine,” encumbered in wit neither by speed nor sharpness. (Luther’s Works AE, Volume. 40, p. 252, © CPH, St. Louis, MO)  It’s really just the rude and disrespectful talk over to which our sinful tongues are given.  The eighth and fourth commandments warn us against such idle claptrap.

There will most certainly be Non-LCMS Lutherans in heaven.  We trust here not in the false teachings of other Christian churches.  Instead, we trust in the felicitous inconsistency.  Luther coined the term, but we understand its use better from Francis Pieper’s Christian Dogmatics (Vol. I: p. 6, 72, 84, 87-91; Vol. II: p. 156 © 1950, CPH)

The felicitous inconsistency is a happy accident, a result differing from what false teaching is likely to deliver: unbelief and hell.  The felicitous inconsistency is the teaching in Christianity that where the Word of God is heard, true faith may spring-up in contradiction of false teaching.  This is no guarantee.  It’s our hope and prayer that the Lord grants faith to those who hear and preserves them in that faith.  This hope and prayer flies against the false teaching in heterodox churches.  It isn’t a thing we ought to expect or into which we ought to place our trust.

Loving our family, friends, and neighbors requires us to encourage them away from false teachers and heterodox churches.  Simply being in a “Christian” church is good, but it’s certainly not good enough.  In love, we ought to want our loved ones to hear only right teaching.  We should want the Word of God AND right teaching entering their ears and hearts together rather than simply hoping God will preserve them.

Even in orthodox churches like our LCMS churches, Jesus warning about wheat and tares still holds true (Matthew 13:24-30).   There will still be unbelievers gathered with the faithful until the last day.  Only then the Lord will finally sort us into the fire and into salvation.  Fear not! If this worries you, that’s great news.  The unbelieving tares don’t care about their salvation one bit.  That’s not you.

All that being said, there will certainly be non-LCMS Lutherans in heaven.  But, in heaven we will all finally be Lutheran.  In heaven we will all finally trust in grace alone apart from works.  We will never doubt the salvation won on the cross, delivered in Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, and sealed with us in the bodily resurrection.  And, there will not be one unbeliever among us.

Hang tight, there’s more to be said about this felicitous inconsistency concerning the false teachers too. In Christ all will finally be one, just not quite yet.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

©2023 Jason Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@gmail.com

I frequently get some version of this question, “Do you really think the Lutheran Church* is the only right church?” (*the LCMS and those Lutherans in our global fellowship)

Yes, I do.  And, you ought to thank the Lord if your pastor isn’t some unfaithful, vow-breaking squish, who believes one thing and says another.  Summer is the season of installations and ordinations in the LCMS.  Nearly every weekend from mid-June through August, there will be such an event at an LCMS congregation.  The Vows taken by your pastor and the others like him are these:

“Do you believe and confess the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments to be the inspired Word of God and the only infallible rule of faith and practice?  Yes, I believe and confess the canonical Scriptures to be the inspired Word of God and the only infallible rule of faith and practice.” (LSB Agenda, p. 165)

What does this mean?  This means that the Christian faith must never embrace what scripture condemns and never condemn what scripture extolls.  There are a good number of Christian churches and pastors falling outside of this first vow.  Anyone denying infant Baptism or infant faith, denies scripture’s plain teaching.  Anyone denying Baptismal regeneration, denies the scriptures.  Anyone denying the forgiveness of sins and the true, bodily presence of Jesus in Holy Communion, denies the Word of God.  Anyone engaged in the ordination of women into the Holy Ministry, despises the Word of God.  Anyone teaching the re-sacrifice of Jesus in the mass, rejects the scriptures.  This list is far from exhaustive.

“Do you believe and confess the three Ecumenical Creeds, namely, the Apostles’, the Nicene, and the Athanasian Creeds, as faithful testimonies to the truth of the Holy Scriptures, and do you reject all the errors which they condemn?  Yes, I believe and confess the three Ecumenical Creeds because they are in accord with the Word of God.  I also reject all the errors they condemn.” (ibid.)

What does this mean?  All heresies rejected in the creeds, we reject.  In current terms, that means things like the constant, popular, gnostic view of death.  Death is not a release of the soul from the body.  Death is the unnatural, violent separation of soul from body.  Death is not the final destination.  The resurrection of all flesh and the restoration of soul and body together on the last day is the completion of all things promised to Baptized Christians.  Also, the creeds may not be rejected by Christians, as some do (Joel Osteen, many Baptists, et al).

“Do you confess the unaltered Augsburg Confession to be a true exposition of Holy Scripture and a correct exhibition of the doctrine of the Evangelical Lutheran Church?  And do you confess that the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, the Small and Large Catechisms of Martin Luther, the Smalcald Articles, the Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope, and the Formula of Concord—as these are contained in the Book of Concord—are also in agreement with this one scriptural faith?  Yes, I make these confessions my own because they are in accord with the Word of God.” (LSB Agenda, p. 166)

What does this mean?  This is where the rubber meets the road.  The Lutheran Confessions are correct in their entirely.  Lutheran Pastors vow this BECAUSE they are the right exposition of and in accord with the Word of God.  As stated above, we can identify errors in other Christian confessions.  In my short 47 years upon the Earth, I have neither discovered an error in our confessions, nor been shown one.  If I or any other Lutheran pastor were convinced of such an error, we would be bound by the first vow to the scriptures alone to fight ceaselessly and publicly against the error, or leave the Lutheran Confession.

“Do you promise that you will perform the duties of your office in accordance with these Confessions, and that all your preaching and teaching and your administrations of the sacraments will be in conformity with Holy Scripture and with these Confessions?  Yes, I promise, with the help of God.” (ibid.)

What does this mean?  All Lutheran pastors are bound by these vows to conform themselves to the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions of the Unaltered Book of Concord (1580 AD).  We must condemn what they condemn and extoll what they extoll.  There is no wiggle room or lateral movement.  Lutheran pastors are or are not faithful.

Christians teaching a different confession are in error.

Rev. Jason M. Kaspar
Sole Pastor
Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church & Preschool
La Grange, TX
And
Mission Planting Pastoral team
Epiphany Lutheran Church, Bastrop, TX

©2023 Jason Kaspar. All rights reserved. Permission granted to copy, share and display freely for non-commercial purposes. Direct all other rights and permissions inquiries to cosmithb@gmail.com