Captive to the Word of God – What Does This Mean?

On April 18th, 1521, the imperial herald escorted Martin Luther to a larger chamber in the archbishop’s residence. There the Diet gathered to hear him. The group was larger — many people not a part of the assembly had joined them to hear the reformer. He had to wait until six o’clock, since other business had occupied the attention of the estates. Due to the lateness of the hour, torches were lit to light the chamber.

Johann von der Ecken, the Emperor’s spokesman, repeated the questions from the day before. Unlike his first appearance, Luther spoke loudly and confidently, first in German and then in Latin. His language was appropriately humble and restrained, yet firm and in command of his answer. He had prepared well.

He began by apologizing for his lack of courtly manners, noting he was unaccustomed of being before so worthy an audience. His motive for teaching and writing was to honor God and instruct the faithful. He acknowledge that, unless the contents of the books on the table had been altered in some way, that the writings there were his.

In reply to whether he would confess or retract any of them, he divided the works into three types. The first group were so innocent and useful that even his opponents praised them. It would not do to retract them. The second group of works address the abuses and evil done and taught in the church that even the German nation complained about. To retract those works would be to let those evils continue. He could not do that. The third group were those that attacked personally those defending these errors. He admitted that his language was over the top and not fitting for his office and vocation. To retract these would be to condone their views, which he could not do.

Answering Von der Ecken’s admonition that he give heed to the peace of the church, he believed it necessary to bring conflict for the sake of the Gospel, that Jesus had come not for peace but the sword. One must fear God. He did not intend, nor needed to instruct the authorities of the German nation, but he did not want to fail his nation. He begged them not to be poisoned by the words of his opponents. If he was in error, he invited them to correct him from the word of God and solid reason. If they did so, he would throw his own books on the fire. Elector Frederick was especially pleased with the latin version of this reply.

The Emperor’s spokesman then said it was not the books themselves that concerned him. If Luther would retract his heretical statements and theology, the Emperor would intercede with the Pope and the good need not be destroyed with the evil. If he did not, then they would all be destroyed. Von der Ecken dismissed the appeal to Scriptures as the attempt of all heretics to be the final judge over doctrine. He then asked Luther for a simple answer without horns or teeth.

Luther’s answer has gone down through five hundred years as a classic statement of confession and bravery:

Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures or by clear reason (for I do not trust either in the pope or in councils alone, since it is well known that they have often erred and contradicted themselves), I am bound by the Scriptures I have quoted and my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not retract anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience. May God help me. Amen
Martin Luther (from Martin Brecht, Martin Luther, 1:160.

The words, “Here I stand, I can do no other” were likely not said by Luther. They do not appear in accounts from that time, but in later editions of the reports.

After exchanging a few words, Luther was escorted out by two imperial officials. When the crowd asked if he had been arrested, the answer was no. Back in his room, Luther was elated at his performance. Elector Frederick commented to Spalatin: “Father Martinus spoke well before the Lord Emperor, all the princes, and the estates. But be is much too bold for me.”

For several weeks, an imperial commission met with Luther to see if some sort of settlement could be reached while the Diet struggled to decide what action to take.